Visiting India for medical treatment can be extremely expensive, but the pros outweigh the cons for many patients. Medical Tourism in India has been increasing over the past few years, and Indian doctors and hospitals are well known for their expertise and compassion. However, there are some factors you should know before making your decision. For instance, Indian medical facilities may not have labour rooms, and they lack privacy. While the cost of treatment in public hospitals is significantly lower, there are other cons to consider.
Public health facilities are devoid of privacy
In addition to being overcrowded, public health facilities in India offer little privacy or comfort. Patients often share beds and the cleanliness of facilities is questionable. While the public health system is one of the best in Asia, expats are advised to go elsewhere for their medical needs unless they can afford to spend more money. There are many pros and cons to choosing a private medical facility over a public one.
Public health facilities are devoid of comfort
Many of India’s public health facilities struggle to provide basic care and are often overcrowded. They also lack privacy and comfort, as patients often share beds. Additionally, cleanliness is a concern, and the facilities are overcrowded. Public hospitals in India are not an ideal place for medical tourism, so expatriates should avoid them whenever possible. Instead, seek care elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of using public health facilities in India:
They are cheaper than private hospitals
There are several reasons why Indian Medical Visa costs less than the prices of private hospitals in the UK. For starters, the NHS in the UK is free of charge, but many patients face long waits and rush-out times. As a result, many are heading to India to get medical treatment. The British government is currently considering a proposal by Apollo Hospitals to subcontract work to a local hospital, which would cut waiting times and costs. However, the costs of private care remain too high for most of the 1.1 billion-strong population of India. Meanwhile, a government-owned hospital in Delhi, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), is free for Indian medical tourists and costs less than the British NHS.
Medical Attendant Visa for India, the Indian government is actively courting foreign patients and promoting its ancient medical traditions. The Indian government has introduced a special medical visa for patients from outside the country, which is a one-year visa that allows patients to travel to India for medical treatment. The result of this policy is a rapid expansion of the private health care sector in India. Last year, Max Healthcare’s chain of hospitals treated up to 50,000 foreign patients. Many of these patients had travelled from the Middle East and Central Asia to get specialized medical care in India.
India’s healthcare system is huge, with a diverse mix of public and private hospitals. The government’s health sector spends $36 billion annually, or about one percent of its GDP. The government also funds various state health-care schemes, including emergency hospitalization, for the unemployed and underemployed. The cost of a hospital visit in India can range from half to a third of a monthly salary. Moreover, government health insurance policies provide coverage for the poorer section of the population.
While the cost of treatment in India is significantly cheaper than the costs of private hospitals in the UK, patients from Africa and the Middle East also flock to the country for treatment. The country’s medical expertise and technology has become the main reasons for the success of this trend. Besides, Indian patients can avail of a wide variety of services that are not available in the UK or the US. The costs of these services are much lower than those of private hospitals in the UK and the US.
